7 Comments
User's avatar
Wanderlust and Words's avatar

Will you take various sections of P’ 25 and expand or do an analysis for your readers?

Expand full comment
Joyce Wycoff's avatar

That was my original intention. Now, I'm going to try to find credible voices to examine the details. I'm not qualified to do that analysis.

Expand full comment
Anita Perez Ferguson's avatar

I'm confident 2025 is working in the best direction. We will all benefit from your support and promotion of their efforts.

Expand full comment
Joyce Wycoff's avatar

While I'm committed to staying open, I am far from supporting or promoting Project 2025. My attempt will be to try to find truth over the next several months. I believe we need "diverse voices" so it's important to hear what this $22 million project is trying to tell us.

Expand full comment
Anita Perez Ferguson's avatar

Hello. It's called a Transition Team & every Presidential campaign in modern history has had one, right along side their `Get-Out-the-Vote' efforts. I have personally been a part of several.

While the goals and coalitions are alarming in the case you describe, they are mirrored by the loyal opposition among progressive stakeholders with whom you may be more closely aligned.

Support your candidate & their causes. Refrain from alarmist hyperbole and making assumptions about large swaths of the electorate (serving wealthy, white, and corporate and Christian-only interests).

Expand full comment
Joyce Wycoff's avatar

You could be right, however, I think we're talking about a different animal here. While I don't tend to be an alarmist, Project 2025 is spelled out in plain terms which are quite alarming. Eliminating two established departments ... Education and Commerce ... is just one example of how radical this plan is.

Expand full comment
Sue Ferrera's avatar

Thank you, Joyce. I will look forward to your monthly posts!

Expand full comment